Friday, 29 June 2012
We have in our patriarchal world a strange phenomenon called femdom where men strongly desire to be women’s abused slaves. What makes this so weird, is that we live in a male dominated world. So why would men have desires like this, if they are suppose to be the dominant sex? Does this mean there is something wrong with these men, or is the belief that men are naturally dominant, not true?
We have to question the idea that men are dominant when we find that throughout history, slavery has been commonplace. Ancient civilizations like the Greeks and Romans were slave economies and even in societies that didn't have slaves, still had serfs and peasants, which were treated nearly as badly as slaves. As the French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau was to observe, "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains."
What we find in the whole of recorded history is that a just handful of male rulers found it easy to exploit the vast majority of people. This is as true today as it ever was, as the majority of the world’s wealth and power is in the hands of only 1% of the world’s population. So how is this possible? And why do the common people allow this?
The reason for this, is that men are totally obedient to anyone in authority over them. An extreme example of this total compliance was seen in World War One. In this war, millions of British, French, Russian and German troops all obeyed orders to come out of their trenches to face near certain death by machine gun fire. The mystery is, why so few men didn't obey these insane orders.
In World War Two, the Japanese took this blind obedience a step further by ordering their airmen to crash their aircraft into enemy ships in kamikaze attacks. Muslim extremists in more recent times have their own version of suicide bombers by attaching explosives to their body and blowing themselves up in crowded areas.
So why are men so obedient that they will kill themselves when ordered to do so? Or easy allow themselves to be exploited by a small ruling elite? The only answer is that men seem to have a slave mentality. When we see how easy it is to enslave men and make them totally obedient. We have to question whether men are truly the dominant sex.
So if men are not dominant, what about women? In every patriarchal society women are oppressed even more than men. This is because; the ruling elite have invented laws and customs to keep women in a state of servitude. For thousands of years, men have been told that they cannot be ‘real’ men unless they are able to dominate women. To do this, they have been encouraged to use their greater size and strength to impose their will onto women.
An extreme example of this is the ‘honour’ system in Muslim countries where a man is dishonoured if his wife disobeys him. He then expected to either beat up or kill his wife to regain his ‘honour’. It seems that the ruling elite has had to work harder at oppressing women, than they do at oppressing men.
The problem for women is that when they become very good subservient patriarchal wives, men don’t appreciate this and treat them with contempt. In much the same way the ruling elite has total contempt for the very obedient men who keep them in power. So why have the ruling elite in every country of the world have been so anti-women? The reason might be that women are their main competitor, in being able to enslave men.
The power of any ruling elite depends of the total obedience of the men they rule. For instance, the power of an emperor, king or dictator depends on the total obedience of army of young men who will kill, maim or torture anyone who opposes or questions his rule. It is true in democratic governments, things are more complicated. But as we see today, billionaires can subvert any democracy, because it is so easy for them to bribe corrupt politicians. But if a ruling elite doesn’t enslave and exploit men who else can do this? The answer might be, women.
What if all of patriarchal indoctrination are lies and women are the natural dominant sex? Could it be that all men would have a powerful desire to worship all women and desire to be enslaved and dominated by them. This would mean that the femdom fantasies may not be the kinky desires of a small group of men, but what most men want and yearn for.
So if it is natural of men to want to worship women why are we living in a male dominated world? The answer seems to be that thousands of years ago a small group of men used men’s natural obedience to authority, to their own advantage.
The archaeologists Marija Gimbutas put forward a theory that back in the Neolithic age we lived in peaceful matriarchal societies. Then about five thousand years ago, warlike patriarchal tribe swept down from the North and conquered them. They could easy do this because a handful of extremely violent men can always defeat a far larger army of peaceful men who are averse to killing other people.
So what Marija Gimbutas theory suggests is that women had no trouble in dominating men, until a small group of men then used violence against matriarchal people. But once patriarchal rule was established then patriarchy has retained its power not only though violence but also through propaganda and indoctrination.
Patriarchy couldn't have lasted unless men have a natural desire to blindly obey those in authority. So instead of men obeying women, as in the last matriarchal age, men now obeyed a small ruling elite of rich and powerful men. So how can ordinary men and women break the power of the patriarchal rulers? It can be done by challenging patriarchal lies and propaganda.
Feminism has been fairly successful in doing this by questioning the idea that men are the natural dominant sex through proclaiming, women and men are equal. As the result, we now see more women with wealth and positions of power. The problem with feminism is that it sets a limitation of what is achievable by women. As feminist push forward to gain more power, they find themselves being accused of sexism as well, if they gain too much power for women.
The cornerstone of patriarchal propaganda was that a male god ordained that men shall rule over women. So if people believe this, then it suggests that very bossy women or men with femdom desires are either sinful or sexual perverts. Something feminist would also agree with, because they believe in sexual equality. For this reason, men who believe patriarchal indoctrination try to suppress their femdom desires. At the same time bossy women try to conceal their dominant nature as they face strong criticism in patriarchal societies, or even from feminists.
If it becomes acceptable for men to have femdom desires and for women to dominate men, then far more men can express their femdom desires and not fight against them. This would make it far easier for women to gain the upper hand in their relationships with men.
Women are competing with a handful of alpha men, for the totally obedience of the majority of men. The more women can get men to their question patriarchal brainwashing, the more likely men will follow their natural instincts to obey women.
Though if the patriarchal ruling elite realize they are losing this propaganda war, will they resort to violence? Fortunately women no longer need to be as helpless against male violence as they once were. The Amazons probably lost out to patriarchal armies as they were at a physical disadvantage fighting men with swords and axes. This is not such a problem today, as you don’t need to be extremely strong to pull the trigger of a gun.
As seen with Kurdish female soldiers, women today can match men on the battlefield with modern weapons. Also, male soldiers can also fight wars and yet still be subservient to women at the same time.
It is only patriarchal brainwashing that prevents men from following their natural feelings to want to serve and worship women. The trouble is that this patriarchal propaganda comes to us all from schools, books, newspapers, films and TV shows. As the result, most people never get to hear the other side of the story and may not even know what matriarchy is.
Fortunately today we have the internet where men can not only express their femdom desires but people can talk about matriarchy and why women should rule the world. Through this we can reach more and more people and make matriarchy a world-wide movement.
Saturday, 16 June 2012
Many Christians have a problem with the very ‘meek and mild’ Jesus as portrayed in the New Testament. This is because this image is totally at odds with the very macho men like David, Samson and Moses you find in the Old Testament. Also, a loving and humble Jesus is not how men are expected to behave in our society, where men are expected to be assertive, aggressive and even violent, if they want to be like the ‘real men’ that are portrayed as heroes in the movies.
This is also why in our patriarchal world, masochistic or femdom men are seen as perverts, wimps and losers, because they are not macho. To the degree that some people will see it as a mental illness that needs a cure. Yet the teachings of Jesus Christ in the New Testament seem to be very masochistic. As we can see in the following two examples, taken from the King James version of the Bible.
In Matthew chapter 5 verse 38
Ye have heard that it hath been said. And eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth:
But I say unto you. That ye resist not evil: but whosoever she smite thee on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also.
And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.
Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee and not turn not thou away.
Ye have heard that it hath been said. Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
But I say unto you. Love your enemies, bless them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you:
That ye many be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth the rain on the just and on the unjust.
We can see a similar concept in another Gospel.
Luke chapter 6 verse 27
But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you.
Bless them that curse you and pray for them which despitefully use you.
And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloak forbid not to take away thy coat also.
Give to every man that asketh of thee; and of him that taketh away thy goods ask them not again
And as ye would that man should do to you, do also to them likewise
For if ye love them which love you, what thanks have ye for sinners also, love those that love them.
And if ye do good to them which do good to you, what thank have ye? For sinners also do even the same.
And if ye lend to them of whom you hope to receive, what thank ye? For sinners also lend to sinners, to receive much gain.
But love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend hoping for nothing again; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be the children of the highest: For he is kind unto the unthankful and to the evil.
Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father is merciful.
Judge not and ye shall not be judged: condemn not and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven.
Now, some Christians find these teachings an embarrassment and try to ignore them. This is because a person who is willing to, “turn the other cheek”, or “love your enemies, do good to them which hate you”, could be defined as a wimp or masochist. Christians who are willing to accept these teaching don’t see it that way and claim what Jesus is teaching, is deep sacrificial love. Certainly, this is the type of unconditional love that women give to their children. The trouble is that Jesus not only taught that we should love others to the degree, it sounds masochistic, he also practiced it.
Jesus not only allowed himself to knowingly be betrayed by his disciple Judas, he didn’t try to defend himself from accusations made by the Pharisees. He also didn’t cooperate with Pilate’s attempts to get him released. In the end, he voluntary allowed himself to be mocked, beaten, whipped, tortured and crucified.
Mel Gibson was strongly criticised because of his film “The Passion Of The Christ” he showed the extreme torture of Jesus in all its revolving horror. In contrast of most films and books on Jesus that has tried to gloss over this.
So was Jesus a masochist? If we are to claim that masochists are perverts, then the sacrificial teachings and behaviour of Jesus makes no sense at all. But if we accept that masochism demonstrates an extreme commitment to love others, more than yourself, then we can understand what Jesus was attempting to teach and demonstrate by his sacrifice.
It used to be claimed by psychologist that all women are masochists and perhaps this is true if you want to give birth and bring up children. This is because devoted mothers will put the welfare of her children before her own and sacrifice herself for the needs of her children. Unfortunately many men take advantage of this by acting like children which triggers women’s maternal instincts. As the result, these child-men can get away with abusing women.
In the two thousand years of history from the time Jesus’s death to now, has been a history of continuous conflict, wars, torture, oppression, and inequality. So we can say that Christianity has been a failure in teaching men to be as loving and peaceful as what Jesus was. Because, if all men acted and behaved in the same way as Jesus did, then there would be hardly any wars, conflict or crime. Yet, in our modern world there is one group of men who are more like Jesus than most men, and these are men who have strong femdom desires.
What is interesting is that these men are not motivated to be as humble or masochistic, by any religion or spiritual ideal. They are motivated by a powerful sexual fantasy. Certainly, if all men had strong femdom desires to serve and worship women, then we would no longer live in a world of conflict and wars. Men would only want to veneration women and not be so interested in fighting and violence.
Another aspect of this would be, that if men worshiped women, it would mean women would rule the world. Women are far less little interests in wars and violence than what men are. Also women tend to be more loving towards children; a matriarchal government would never allow any child to grow up in poverty and ignorance. So they would rule a far more peaceful world and do their best to eliminate poverty.
So we can see a similarity between the desires of femdom men and Christians who strictly follow Jesus’s teachings. (This doesn’t include the Christians who follow the teachings in the Old Testament or the teachings of St Paul). So by either following the teaching of Jesus or having Femdom desires, will tend to make men more humble and caring people. Now, many people would assume that only a small minority of men have femdom desires. But is this true?
Patriarchy tells men that it is natural for men to be violent and dominate women. Yet patriarchy puts pressure onto men to be like this. For instance, Lt. Col. Dave Grossman of the US army, written books explaining how military forces all over the world have to brutalise or train men how to kill other men. This is because, as the military has discovered, that if soldiers are not trained to kill, the majority of them, will not kill the enemy on the battle-field. So if violence was natural for men, then the military wouldn't need to train and indoctrinate their soldiers into becoming killers.
The same is true of the idea that it is natural for men to dominate women. In patriarchal societies all over the world men are put under pressure to be the dominant partner in their relationships with women. An extreme example of this is the ‘honour’ system in Islamic countries. Where men are under extreme social pressure to beat-up or kill their wives if they disobey them. The point is that if male dominance was as natural as the Islamic religion claims, men wouldn't have to be indoctrinated to dominate their wives, and wives wouldn't need to be threatened with extreme violence to obey men.
It is femdom desires within men that threaten all patriarchal societies and this is why patriarchal societies condemn men, who allow their wives to be the dominant partner. For this reason, even today, in couples where the woman is the dominant, it is still kept a secret.
It is true that many women complain about how femdom men try to, “top from the bottom” and make demands on dominant women. But, we also must remember that all femdom men are brought up in patriarchal societies and have been contaminated by patriarchal thinking. It is hard for both women and men to not be influenced by the surrounding patriarchal society, even if they do have strong femdom desires.
As the result, many femdom men feel ashamed of their femdom desires because of their patriarchal upbringing and still try to resist them, which creates an inner conflict. This can make it very confusing for any women he is interacting with, because sometimes he is being very subservient to her and other times he is acting like a typical patriarchal male.
This might have been the problem Jesus had in promoting his doctrine. His teachings would have made a lot more sense if he sacrificed himself to a Goddess rather than a male god, as this would have awakened femdom desires within men. But this probably would have not been acceptable at the time. His teachings were controversial enough, without him also worshiping a female deity.
Another point was that Jesus tried to put across the concept of a loving male god, which never caught on. Most Christians, over the last two thousand years, have worshiped the judgmental and punitive god of the Old Testament rather than the loving Father God of the New Testament. This is because men are not as loving as women, so people had problems in imagining a male god that is truly loving. Whereas a loving Mother Goddess would have made far more sense, as it is so much easier to envisage a loving feminine deity.
Therefore, it might mean that half of Jesus’s original teachings may have not survived. He either censored himself, to make his teaching more acceptable, to people of the time. Or he may have put out the ideas of men worshiping women and a female deity but this was later censored by his followers. The latter might be a strong possibility, because in the few surviving Gnostic Gospels, it is claimed that Jesus worshiped the Goddess Sophia.
The history of Christianity shows us that most men are not motivated to love and care for others, by his teachings. As most Christians prefer the teachings in the Old Testament. But this might be different if we had Christian femdom teachings. Most men are not naturally interested in worshiping male gods, as patriarchal religions have to brainwash men into doing this. But if we free men from patriarchal conditioning, then most men would probably prefer to worship a female deity.
History has shown us that all religions that worship male gods tend to be violent. Even Buddhism which follows the teachings of Gautama Buddha, who like Jesus taught peace and compassion, can be very violent. As we have seen recently in the Sri Lankan and Myanmar civil wars, which are Buddhist countries. If we want to have a truly peaceful and loving world, which Jesus advocated, then this would only be possible if all men were encouraged to worship women.
So if Christianity teachings are to make men more loving and caring, in the way Jesus advocated. Then it will be far more successful if the teachings of Jesus are linked to men’s Femdom desires, so men can learn how to deeply love others, through their sexual desires to serve and venerate the female sex.